Free Essays on Friedrich Nietzsche

Friedrich Nietzsche, a unique philosopher had some very interesting ideas about people’s human values and personality types. In this essay I will explain what I like and dislike about his "Master Morality" & his antithesis to this, "Slave Morality". According to Nietzche, all morality is a manifestation of the will to power. The other is driven by the will to power but attempts to deny this. The term "master morality" refers to all the values of the psychologically strong willed people. They stress independence, personal dignity, self-approval and the will to succeed. For such people "good" refers to whatever leads to self-fulfillment with values such as nobility, strength, courage, power and pride. The antithesis to the master morality is the "slave morality." This morality appeals to those who are uncertain of themselves, weak willed. They define "good" as what makes life easier, safer, with such qualities as patience, humility, charity, modesty and compassion. I agree and d isagree with Nietzsche. I agree with the will to power. That all individuals are driven by this will. I am living proof. I want to be in charge of my future. I have goals in every aspect of my life that I want to fulfill, everyone does. Without these goals there would be no motivation for life. Artists wouldn’t want to be artists, scientists wouldn’t care about science, and people wouldn’t care about themselves. I also agree with the master morality’s virtues not the master morality as a perfect being. I think we need these virtues In order to succeed in fulfilling the goals set forth by the will to power. I feel that when a person finds him or herself these master morality virtues are evident. The slave morality on the otherhand, I think has some virtues and some downfalls as Nietzsche suggests. Patience, modesty, charity and compassion are some of the virtues that Nietszche believes to be "sour grapes". I believe in these qualities. The part of the slav ... Free Essays on Friedrich Nietzsche Free Essays on Friedrich Nietzsche Friedrich Nietzsche, a unique philosopher had some very interesting ideas about people’s human values and personality types. In this essay I will explain what I like and dislike about his "Master Morality" & his antithesis to this, "Slave Morality". According to Nietzche, all morality is a manifestation of the will to power. The other is driven by the will to power but attempts to deny this. The term "master morality" refers to all the values of the psychologically strong willed people. They stress independence, personal dignity, self-approval and the will to succeed. For such people "good" refers to whatever leads to self-fulfillment with values such as nobility, strength, courage, power and pride. The antithesis to the master morality is the "slave morality." This morality appeals to those who are uncertain of themselves, weak willed. They define "good" as what makes life easier, safer, with such qualities as patience, humility, charity, modesty and compassion. I agree and d isagree with Nietzsche. I agree with the will to power. That all individuals are driven by this will. I am living proof. I want to be in charge of my future. I have goals in every aspect of my life that I want to fulfill, everyone does. Without these goals there would be no motivation for life. Artists wouldn’t want to be artists, scientists wouldn’t care about science, and people wouldn’t care about themselves. I also agree with the master morality’s virtues not the master morality as a perfect being. I think we need these virtues In order to succeed in fulfilling the goals set forth by the will to power. I feel that when a person finds him or herself these master morality virtues are evident. The slave morality on the otherhand, I think has some virtues and some downfalls as Nietzsche suggests. Patience, modesty, charity and compassion are some of the virtues that Nietszche believes to be "sour grapes". I believe in these qualities. The part of the slav ... Free Essays on Friedrich Nietzsche Both, Friedrich Nietzsche in his â€Å"Thus spoke Zaratuthstra† and Imants Ziedonis in his â€Å"Epifanijas† explore the subject of our existence. Nietzsche constantly asks questions, while Ziedonis tries to give answers to the causes of various problems. Both men refer to God, and although Nietzsche denies him, still, it is evident that both men are related by the same spirit that is reflected in their work. Even with some difference in believes exploited, the reader seems to derive the same message from these two works: what is men importance in this world? Friedrich Nietzsche through out his life believed in nihilism. Thus, the existence of men where God is not involved. This can be clearly seen in the Prologue of his book â€Å"Thus spoke Zaratuthstra†, where Zarathustra denies God, â€Å"Could it be possible! This old saint in the forest not yet heard of it, that God is dead!† This dilemma is also explored farther more when Zarathustra speaks to a dieing man, "there is nothing of all that whereof thou speakest: there is no devil and no hell. Thy soul will be dead even sooner than thy body; fear, therefore, nothing any more!" Through this conversation it is clear that eternity for Nietzsche also has ceased to exist, hence for him men is the only importance to the world. Nietzsche picks up this idea and explores it further, in the conversation between Zarathustra and the saint, where Zarathustra boldly states, â€Å"I love mankind,† hence proves that in his nihilist hierarchy, man is superior to God, for God simply does not exist. By showing this, Nietzsche seems to question himself, for in his book, he often uses allusions to the bible, such as some of Ten Commandments in part five of a Prologue: â€Å"Love thy neighbour as thy friend† and â€Å"Do not covet for what you do not have†, as well as he also mentions that all men are equal and have same rights and wants as others. In Ziedonis’s â€Å"Epifanijas,† the existence of God is ...

Better Use Redneck with Care

Better Use Redneck with Care Better Use Redneck with Care Better Use Redneck with Care By Maeve Maddox A man speaking in a city board meeting in my town this week got into trouble for using the word redneck. He was arguing that shrinking city funds would be better spent on maintaining the local cable access channel than on Christmas lights in the town square. He stirred up a storm of protest when he referred to the city employees putting up the lights as highly-paid rednecks. The uproar got me thinking about this term, one of my least favorite group designators. As far as I can interpret the mans remarks, he wanted to convey the thought that the cable channel, as a means of communicating the workings of the city government, is of more value than mere seasonal display. So why did he choose to call the men putting up the lights rednecks instead of, say, workers? The mind functions in curious ways. Our thoughts reside there in layers upon layers. Sometimes what may seem like an insignificant word choice reveals a layer we may not even be aware of. The speaker came to Arkansas from California. He may not realize it himself, but his choice of the word redneck suggests an attitude of superiority towards the natives. For those readers who may not be familiar with the term, redneck in modern American usage is used chiefly to refer to a perceived type of Southern white person. The term has been used in other contexts with other possible origins, but the term, as popularized by standup comic Jeff Foxworthy, probably derives from the sunburned necks of outdoor laborers. Foxworthy, a native of Georgia, can use the term with impunity, rather as black comics can get away with nigger. Depending upon who is using it, the word redneck can be inoffensive or deeply pejorative. As used in country songs, redneck carries a connotation of pride along with the characteristics of patriotism, belief in God, self-respect, and independence. This kind of redneck probably drives a pickup truck and owns a gun. Hes not afraid of hard work and would rather go hungry than accept charity in any form. He mistrusts overeducated people and prefers the country or small town to the city. As used by outsiders, redneck seems to have replaced hillbilly as a word to stereotype Southerners. As a term of opprobrium, a redneck not only drives a pickup and owns a gun, he is loud, often drunk, ignorant, bigoted, xenophobic, and trashy. He dresses like a slob, speaks with a southern accent, fills his yard with junk, and has no appreciation of the finer things of life. The term has its uses, both in conversation and in writing, but it can be volatile and is best used with care. Youll find further information about redneck and other terms often applied in a pejorative sense to Southerners here (Update: page no longer online). Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Expressions category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Apply to, Apply for, and Apply withEmail EtiquetteNominalized Verbs